subscribe: Posts | Comments

Time for a Fresh Look at the “Undue Hardship” Bankruptcy Standard for Student Debtors

Comments Off

ABSTRACT: In 1978, Congress enacted 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8), thereby restricting the availability of student-loan discharge for student debtors. The statute required a student debtor to establish that repaying the loan would cause “undue hardship” in order for a court to grant discharge. “Undue hardship” lacked a definition in § 523(a)(8), however, and courts derived a number of different tests to measure a debtor’s inability to make future loan payments. Circuits were split over two tests: the Brunner test and the totality test. Additionally, regardless of which test a court applied, some courts required the debtor to prove a “certainty of hopelessness” for any future loan repayment. This Note examines different circuits’ approaches to the “undue hardship” determination and advocates for a congressional solution that would codify the Eighth Circuit’s totality test and create a partial discharge provision for debtors who have met the “undue hardship” requirement. The Note argues, in the absence of congressional action, courts should interpret “undue hardship” in a fashion consistent with this Note’s proposed amendments to § 523(a)(8). Alternatively, courts should look to Congress’s definition of “undue hardship” in 11 U.S.C. § 524(m) to provide a basis for interpreting § 523(a)(8). These solutions would provide more clarity to the “undue hardship” standard in changing economic and social times while respecting Congress’s intent and the “fresh start” purpose of the Bankruptcy Code.  


Download Full Article